• Annual Research Reviews
    • NW Cherry and Stone Fruit Research Review
    • Technology Research Review
    • Apple Crop Protection Research Review
    • Apple Horticulture & Postharvest Research Review
    • NW Pear Research Review
  • Requests for Proposals
    • Active Requests for Proposals
    • Past RFP’s
  • About Us
    • Commissioners
    • Staff
    • Interns
    • Committees
    • Technology Roadmap
    • WSU Tree Fruit Endowment
    • Procurement Forecast Report
    • Sitemap
  • Contact
  • Annual Research Reviews
    • NW Cherry and Stone Fruit Research Review
    • Technology Research Review
    • Apple Crop Protection Research Review
    • Apple Horticulture & Postharvest Research Review
    • NW Pear Research Review
  • Requests for Proposals
    • Active Requests for Proposals
    • Past RFP’s
  • About Us
    • Commissioners
    • Staff
    • Interns
    • Committees
    • Technology Roadmap
    • WSU Tree Fruit Endowment
    • Procurement Forecast Report
    • Sitemap
  • Contact
  • Proposal Process, Instructions and Documents
  • Research Database
  • Upcoming Events

Pesticide Residues on WA Apples

Author: Tory Schmidt

Published: 2021

Summary: As we have observed in every study since 2011, no spray program produced a residue that exceeded the tolerance level set by the US Environmental Protection Agency; these findings are further evidence that apple growers following directions on product labels should expect their fruit to be in full compliance for domestic sales regarding pesticide residues. Several products we tested, however, did produce residues which exceed Maximum Residue Levels (MRL's) set in important export markets for Washington apples including: Gatten, Diazinon 50W, Delegate WG, Bexar, Rally 40WSP, Danitol, Inspire Super, Torino, Centaur WDG, and Imidan 70-W.

Keywords:

  • Apple
  • MRL's
  • Maximum Residue Levels
  • Crop Protection
Download PDF

Download PDF

© 2016-2018 Washington Tree Fruit Research Commission. All Rights Reserved.